Florida Senate - 2026                        COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
       Bill No. SB 1326
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì807564<Î807564                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       The Committee on Criminal Justice (Martin) recommended the
       following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Delete everything after the enacting clause
    4  and insert:
    5         Section 1. Section 775.027, Florida Statutes, is amended to
    6  read:
    7         775.027 Insanity defense.—
    8         (1) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—All persons are presumed to be
    9  sane. It is an affirmative defense to a criminal prosecution
   10  that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the
   11  offense, the defendant was insane. Insanity is established when
   12  the defendant had a mental infirmity, disease, or defect and
   13  because of this condition, the defendant did not know what he or
   14  she was doing or its consequences.:
   15         (a) The defendant had a mental infirmity, disease, or
   16  defect; and
   17         (b) Because of this condition, the defendant:
   18         1. Did not know what he or she was doing or its
   19  consequences; or
   20         2. Although the defendant knew what he or she was doing and
   21  its consequences, the defendant did not know that what he or she
   22  was doing was wrong.
   23  
   24  Mental infirmity, disease, or defect does not constitute a
   25  defense of insanity except as provided in this subsection.
   26         (2) BURDEN OF PROOF.—The defendant has the burden of
   27  proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing
   28  evidence.
   29         Section 2. Subsection (3) of section 916.12, Florida
   30  Statutes, is amended to read:
   31         916.12 Mental competence to proceed.—
   32         (3) In considering the issue of competence to proceed, an
   33  examining expert shall first consider and specifically include
   34  in his or her report the defendant’s capacity to:
   35         (a) Appreciate the charges or allegations against the
   36  defendant.
   37         (b) Appreciate the range and nature of possible penalties,
   38  if applicable, that may be imposed in the proceedings against
   39  the defendant.
   40         (c) Understand the adversarial nature of the legal process.
   41         (d) Disclose to counsel facts pertinent to the proceedings
   42  at issue.
   43         (e) Manifest appropriate courtroom behavior.
   44         (f) Testify relevantly.
   45  
   46  In addition, an examining expert shall consider and include in
   47  his or her report whether the expert finds that the defendant is
   48  malingering, what instrument or method was used as the basis for
   49  any such finding, and any other factor deemed relevant by the
   50  expert.
   51         Section 3. Section 916.15, Florida Statutes, is amended to
   52  read:
   53         916.15 Involuntary commitment of defendant adjudicated not
   54  guilty by reason of insanity.—
   55         (1) The determination of whether a defendant is not guilty
   56  by reason of insanity shall be determined in accordance with s.
   57  775.027 and the applicable Rule 3.217, Florida Rules of Criminal
   58  Procedure.
   59         (2) A defendant who is acquitted of criminal charges
   60  because of a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity shall
   61  may be involuntarily committed pursuant to such finding if the
   62  defendant has a mental illness and, because of the illness, is
   63  manifestly dangerous to himself or herself or others.
   64         (3)(a) Every defendant acquitted of criminal charges by
   65  reason of insanity and found to meet the criteria for
   66  involuntary commitment shall may be committed and treated in
   67  accordance with the provisions of this section and the
   68  applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
   69         (b) Immediately after receipt of a completed copy of the
   70  court commitment order containing all documentation required by
   71  the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
   72  department shall request all medical information relating to the
   73  defendant from the jail. The jail shall provide the department
   74  with all medical information relating to the defendant within 3
   75  business days after receipt of the department’s request or at
   76  the time the defendant enters the physical custody of the
   77  department, whichever is earlier.
   78         (c) The department shall admit a defendant so adjudicated
   79  to an appropriate facility or program for treatment and shall
   80  retain and treat such defendant. No later than 6 months after
   81  the date of admission, prior to the end of any period of
   82  extended commitment, or at any time that the administrator or
   83  his or her designee determines that the defendant no longer
   84  meets the criteria for continued commitment placement, the
   85  administrator or designee shall file a report with the court
   86  pursuant to the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
   87         (4) In all proceedings under this section, both the
   88  defendant and the state shall have the right to a hearing before
   89  the committing court. Evidence at such hearing may be presented
   90  by the hospital administrator or the administrator’s designee as
   91  well as by the state and the defendant. The defendant shall have
   92  the right to counsel at any such hearing. In the event that a
   93  defendant is determined to be indigent pursuant to s. 27.52, the
   94  public defender shall represent the defendant. The parties shall
   95  have access to the defendant’s records at the treating
   96  facilities and may interview or depose personnel who have had
   97  contact with the defendant at the treating facilities.
   98         (5) The commitment hearing shall be held within 30 days
   99  after the court receives notification that the defendant no
  100  longer meets the criteria for continued commitment. The
  101  defendant must be transported to the committing court’s
  102  jurisdiction for the hearing. Each defendant returning to a jail
  103  shall continue to receive the same psychotropic medications as
  104  prescribed by the facility physician at the time of discharge
  105  from a forensic or civil facility, unless the jail physician
  106  determines there is a compelling medical reason to change or
  107  discontinue the medication for the health and safety of the
  108  defendant. If the jail physician changes or discontinues the
  109  medication and the defendant is later determined at the
  110  competency hearing to be incompetent to stand trial and is
  111  recommitted to the department, the jail physician may not change
  112  or discontinue the defendant’s prescribed psychotropic
  113  medication upon the defendant’s next discharge from the forensic
  114  or civil facility.
  115         Section 4. Section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, is amended
  116  to read:
  117         921.0026 Mitigating circumstances.—This section applies to
  118  any felony offense, except any capital felony, committed on or
  119  after October 1, 1998.
  120         (1) A downward departure from the lowest permissible
  121  sentence, as calculated according to the total sentence points
  122  pursuant to s. 921.0024, is prohibited unless there are
  123  circumstances or factors that reasonably justify the downward
  124  departure. Mitigating factors to be considered include, but are
  125  not limited to, those listed in subsection (2). The imposition
  126  of a sentence below the lowest permissible sentence is subject
  127  to appellate review under chapter 924, but the extent of
  128  downward departure is not subject to appellate review.
  129         (2) Mitigating circumstances under which a departure from
  130  the lowest permissible sentence is reasonably justified include,
  131  but are not limited to:
  132         (a) The departure results from a legitimate, uncoerced plea
  133  bargain.
  134         (b) The defendant was an accomplice to the offense and was
  135  a relatively minor participant in the criminal conduct.
  136         (c) The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the
  137  criminal nature of the conduct or to conform that conduct to the
  138  requirements of law was substantially impaired.
  139         (d) The defendant requires specialized treatment for a:
  140         1. Severe physical disability; or
  141         2. Severe and persistent mental illness that is unrelated
  142  to substance abuse or addiction, and has been diagnosed by a
  143  qualified professional, as that term is defined in s. 39.01. The
  144  court may not depart from the lowest permissible sentence under
  145  this subparagraph if the defendant is a danger to himself or
  146  herself or others, or is convicted of murder, manslaughter, or
  147  any offense listed in s. 943.0435.
  148         3. This section shall not be construed to allow a convicted
  149  defendant to receive outpatient therapy in lieu of a term of
  150  incarceration. mental disorder that is unrelated to substance
  151  abuse or addiction or for a physical disability, and the
  152  defendant is amenable to treatment.
  153         (e) The need for payment of restitution to the victim
  154  outweighs the need for a prison sentence.
  155         (f) The victim was an initiator, willing participant,
  156  aggressor, or provoker of the incident.
  157         (g) The defendant acted under extreme duress or under the
  158  domination of another person.
  159         (h) Before the identity of the defendant was determined,
  160  the victim was substantially compensated.
  161         (i) The defendant cooperated with the state to resolve the
  162  current offense or any other offense.
  163         (j) The offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner
  164  and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown
  165  remorse.
  166         (k) At the time of the offense the defendant was too young
  167  to appreciate the consequences of the offense.
  168         (l) The defendant is to be sentenced as a youthful
  169  offender.
  170         (m) The defendant’s offense is a nonviolent felony, the
  171  defendant’s Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet total sentence
  172  points under s. 921.0024 are 60 points or fewer, and the court
  173  determines that the defendant is amenable to the services of a
  174  postadjudicatory treatment-based drug court program and is
  175  otherwise qualified to participate in the program as part of the
  176  sentence. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “nonviolent
  177  felony” has the same meaning as provided in s. 948.08(6).
  178         (n) The defendant was making a good faith effort to obtain
  179  or provide medical assistance for an individual experiencing a
  180  drug-related overdose.
  181         (3) Except as provided in paragraph (2)(m), the defendant’s
  182  substance abuse or addiction, including intoxication at the time
  183  of the offense, is not a mitigating factor under subsection (2)
  184  and does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward
  185  departure from the permissible sentencing range.
  186         Section 5. Section 916.145, Florida Statutes, is amended to
  187  read:
  188         916.145 Dismissal of charges.—
  189         (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), the charges
  190  against a defendant adjudicated incompetent to proceed due to
  191  mental illness may not shall be dismissed unless: without
  192  prejudice to the state if
  193         (a) The defendant remains incompetent to proceed for a
  194  duration of time equal to the maximum statutory sentence for
  195  such charges; and
  196         (b) The maximum statutory sentence for such charges is more
  197  than 5 years.
  198         (2) If the defendant’s maximum statutory sentence is equal
  199  to or less than 5 years, 5 continuous, uninterrupted years after
  200  such determination, unless the court in its order specifies its
  201  reasons for believing that the defendant will become competent
  202  to proceed within the foreseeable future and specifies the time
  203  within which the defendant is expected to become competent to
  204  proceed. the court may dismiss such charges at least 3 years
  205  after such determination of incompetency, unless the charge is:
  206         (a) Arson;
  207         (b) Sexual battery;
  208         (c) Robbery;
  209         (d) Kidnapping;
  210         (e) Aggravated child abuse;
  211         (f) Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled
  212  adult;
  213         (g) Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon;
  214         (h) Murder;
  215         (i) Manslaughter;
  216         (j) Aggravated manslaughter of an elderly person or
  217  disabled adult;
  218         (k) Aggravated manslaughter of a child;
  219         (l) Unlawful throwing, projecting, placing, or discharging
  220  of a destructive device or bomb;
  221         (m) Armed burglary;
  222         (n) Aggravated battery;
  223         (o) Aggravated stalking;
  224         (p) A forcible felony as defined in s. 776.08 and not
  225  listed elsewhere in this subsection;
  226         (q) An offense where an element of the offense requires the
  227  possession, use, or discharge of a firearm;
  228         (r) An attempt to commit an offense listed in this
  229  subsection;
  230         (s) An offense allegedly committed by a defendant who has
  231  had a forcible or violent felony conviction within the 5 years
  232  immediately preceding the date of arrest for the nonviolent
  233  felony sought to be dismissed;
  234         (t) An offense allegedly committed by a defendant who,
  235  after having been found incompetent and placed under court
  236  supervision in a community-based program, is formally charged by
  237  a state attorney or the Office of the Statewide Prosecutor with
  238  a new felony offense; or
  239         (u) An offense for which there is an identifiable victim
  240  and such victim has not consented to the dismissal.
  241         (3)(2) This section does not prohibit the state from
  242  refiling dismissed charges if the defendant is declared to be
  243  competent to proceed in the future.
  244  
  245         Section 6. This act shall take effect October 1, 2026
  246  
  247  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
  248  And the title is amended as follows:
  249         Delete everything before the enacting clause
  250  and insert:
  251                        A bill to be entitled                      
  252         An act relating to the prosecution of defendants;
  253         amending s. 775.027, F.S.; revising the qualifications
  254         for an insanity defense; amending s. 916.12, F.S.;
  255         updating reporting requirements for examining experts;
  256         amending s. 916.15; requiring involuntary commitment
  257         for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in
  258         certain circumstances; amending s. 916.145, F.S.;
  259         revising requirements for dismissal of charges;
  260         amending s. 921.0026, F.S.; revising mitigating
  261         circumstances for sentencing; providing an effective
  262         date.